Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4639] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1585/2025 Sabir S/o Ajmat, R/o Village Haivataka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 03/02/2025
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 184/2024 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D and of IT Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred these anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submit that accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner was involved solely on the disclosure statement of the other co-accused. The mobile phones, sim cards, cheques etc. were recovered from the other co-accused Jakar and Sahil. The accused-petitioner has not used the mobiles recovered from the other co-accused. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and custodial interrogation of the
[2025:RJ-JP:4639] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1585/2025] accused-petitioner is not required, therefore, the, anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the recovery of mobile phones and sim cards allegedly used for creating false ID's and obscene videos were effected from the other co-accused namely Jakar and Sahil. The accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioner is not required. Thus, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner Sabir S/o Ajmat in connection with FIR No. 184/2024 registered at Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and
[2025:RJ-JP:4639] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1585/2025] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/26