Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5482 (KAR)

BASAVARAJ S/O MALLAPPA NAIKAMANE v. SUVARNA W/O BHIMARAO TODAKAR

WP/102379/2022 · 2025-02-07

Ashok S Kinagi

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2428 WP No. 102379 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 102379 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. BASAVARAJ S/O MALLAPPA NAIKAMANE AGE. 39 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BAAD, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI - 591309. 2. BHIMAPPA S/O SHIVANAND NAIKAMANE AGE. 30 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BAAD, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI - 591309. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. AVINASH BANAKAR, ADV) AND: 1. SUVARNA W/O BHIMARAO TODAKAR AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BAAD, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI - 591309. 2. SUDHAKAR S/O SHANKAR POTADAR AGE. 54 YEARS, Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2428 WP No. 102379 of 2022 OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BAAD, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI - 591309. 3. APPASAHEB S/O ASHOK POTADAR AGE. 27 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. BAAD, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI - 591309. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SUNANDA P. PATIL, ADV FOR R1. R2 & R3 ARE SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 31.05.2022 ON I.A. U/S 151 OF CPC O.S. NO. 135/2022 ON THE FILE OF I/C PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SANKESHWAR VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF QUO WARRANTO BY DIRECTING THE TRIAL COURT TO EXTEND THE ORDER OF STATUS -QUO DATED 05.05.2022 PASSED IN O.S. NO. 135/2022 ON THE I/C PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SANKESHWAR. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:2428 WP No. 102379 of 2022 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo stating that the petitioners do not intend to prosecute the petition and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn. Memo is placed on record. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE kmv CT: BSB