Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54818 (AP)

RAMIREDDY VENKATA RAMA REDDY v. M JANAKI

CC/3947/2024 · 2025-10-14

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010311952024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3947/2024 Between: 1. RAMIREDDY VENKATA RAMA REDDY, S/O R.R.PRASAD REDDY, DOORNO.19-1-35/3D, BANK COLONY, PEDDAPURAM KAKINADA DISTRICT-533437. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M JANAKI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI SAI PRASAD I A S, SECRETARY WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT 4TH FLOOR JALSOUDHA, IRRIGATION COMPOUND, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 3. SRI G SRINIVASA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER (FAC) IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLAISWARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI G SESHAGIRI RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YELERU IRRIGATION DIVISION, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT 5. SH S SRINIVAS, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YELERU IRRIGATION SUB- DIVISION, SAMALKOT, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. SRI P VEERA BABU, THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. YELERU IRRIGATION SECTION, PITHAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRIC ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents Contemnors for wilful disobedience of the Orders dated 05-03-2024 of this Honble Court made in WP No.4158 of 2024 in terms of Sections 10 to 12 of the of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to implead the 7th respondent District Collector as party contemnor in the present contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. INAKOLLU VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 3. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:3947 OF 2024 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4158 of 2024. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and learned counsel for the respondents. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 06.03.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4158 of 2024 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 15.10.2025 BSP 42 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) Contempt Case No.3947 of 2024 15.10.2025 BSP