Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54811 (PNJ)

MAJLISH HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4645/2025 · 2025-05-07

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4645 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 117 Majlish Hussain State of Haryana and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) CRM-W-629 CRWP-4645 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and wedlock. However, both are presently not residing with their respective spouse and are living respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 03.05.2025 (Annexure P life and liberty. 645-2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Majlish Hussain and another Versus Haryana and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Khalid Tauru, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 629-2025 Application is allowed, as prayed for. 4645-2025 The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 12, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the petitioners are major and married and also having children with However, both are presently not residing with their respective spouse are living together in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from espondent nos.4 to 12. The petitioners have submitted a representation dated .05.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4645-2025 (O&M) Decided on:07.05.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Application is allowed, as prayed for. The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the married and also having children with their respective However, both are presently not residing with their respective spouse in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that both the their respective However, both are presently not residing with their respective spouse in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from . The petitioners have submitted a representation dated 3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4645 3. 4. the respondent 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation (Annexure P protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to th petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live May 07, 2025 vinod* 645-2025 (O&M) Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. Sumit Jain, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Superintendent to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to th petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District Nuh (Mewat) 3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to th petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Nuh (Mewat), 3) of the petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.05.07 17:24 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document