- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37993 RSA No. 599 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 599 OF 2018 BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANNABASAPPA S/O LATE B K BASAVARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A TARALABALU NAGAR 6TH MILE STONE DAVANAGERE-577 006 … APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANNABASAPPA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT RATHNAMMA W/O LATE SHANMUKHAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 2. K S NAGARAJ S/O LATE SHANMUKHAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS 3. K S SUDHA D/O LATE SHANMUKHAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS 4. K S SIDDESH S/O LATE SHANMUKHAPPA AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 ARE R/AT TARALABALU NAGAR Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37993 RSA No. 599 of 2018 6TH MILE STONE DAVANAGERE-577 006 5. B K NIRMALA D/O LATE B K BASAVARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT BELAVANUR VILLAGE P.O. BELAVANUR DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 008. 6. SMT BASAMMA W/O CHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT EMMANABETUR VILLAGE P.O. EMMANABETUR DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 005 7. SMT JAYAMMA W/O KARIBASAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT BORAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE P.O. BORAGONDANAHALLI DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 006. 8. SHIVALINGAPPA S/O SOMASHEKARAPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT SHIRAMAGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE P.O SHIRAMAGONDANAHALLI DAVANAGERE TALUK AND DISTRICT - 577 005. … RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 29.07.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO. 72/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 21.04.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.305/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, DAVANAGERE. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37993 RSA No. 599 of 2018 THIS RSA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. 2. Perused the letter dated 21.06.2023 received from the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Davangere. Though court notice has been served on the appellant personally, appellant has not taken steps to engage the services of a counsel. 2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE VP