APHC010508892006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 3170/2006 Between: 1. B.M. CHANDRA SEKHAR, NELLORE DISTRICT, S/O. B. MUNUSWAMY NAIDU, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, VENKATAGIRI, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGISTRAR HYDERABAD 2 OTHERS, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. THE MUNSIF MAGISTRATE, KOTA, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of certirari or other appropriate order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ calling for the records resulting in the orders dated 29-8-2003 bearing ROC No. 276/2002, C-II/1 passed by the 1st respondent arising out of the order dated 17-8-2002 passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal and exonerate the writ petitioner of the charges framed against him by the enquiry officer vide his orders dated 07-10-1999 and consequently direct the respondent to release all the payments due to petitioner and also grant all other attendant and ancillary benefits and pass 2 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.3170 of 2006 such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 3932 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 29-8-2002 passed by the 1st respondent as also the orders dated 17-8-2002 passed by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner herein pending disposal of the above writ petitiion in the interest of justice and pass necessary order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M S CHANDRESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S S.NAGESWARAREDDY 3 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.3170 of 2006 The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) There was no representation for the petitioner on 15.09.2025 and 10.11.2025, when the matter was posted to today, under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner today also. 3. As the petitioner does not appear to be interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition, it is accordingly, dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 24.11.2025 MJA 4 RRR, J & TCDS, J W.P.No.3170 of 2006 01 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 3170 of 2006 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 24.11.2025 MJA