Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 548 (MEG)

M/S COLONEL SHISHUPAL SECURITY CONSULTANCY AND SERVICES AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/85/2025 · 2025-08-18

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 35 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 85 of 2025 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 1. M/s Colonel Shishupal Security Consultancy & Services Represented by Shri Venu Shishupal Pariat, R/o Goenka Tower, Keating Road, Shillong-793001, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. Shri Venu Shishupal Pariat, S/o (L) Shishupal R. Pariat, R/o Gora Lane Laitumkhrah, Shillong-793003, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Union of India represented by Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi-110001. 2. Government e-Market Place (GeM), Government e-Market Place, Represented by Shri Ajay Bhadoo, 2nd Floor, Jeevan Tara Building, 5-Sansad Marg, Near Patel Chowk, New Delhi-110001. 3. The Director of NEIGRIHMS, NEIGRIHMS, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong-793018 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 4. The Deputy Director of NEIGRIHMS, NEIGRIHMS, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong-793018 East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. 2025:MLHC:732 5. Ranger Security & Service Organisation (RSSO), Represented by Smti Wanjoplin Nongsteng, Mawlai Phudmuri, Shillong-793008, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Kharsyad, Adv. vice Mr. T.T. Diengdoh, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. (For R 1,3&4) vice Dr. N. Mozika, DSGI Mr. R. Kharkrang, Adv. vice Mr. A. Tiwari, Adv. (For R 2) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: (ORAL) 1. Mr. R. Kharsyad, learned counsel for the petitioners prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition as there are other developments that have since occurred, with a liberty to file afresh. 2. The same is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondents. 2025:MLHC:732 3. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however with a liberty to file afresh if any cause of action arises. JUDGE Meghalaya 18.08.2025 “V. Lyndem-PS” 2025:MLHC:732 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2025.08.18 17:03:02 IST