Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54793 (KAR)

SRI M NAVEENA v. SRI JAYAKUMAR

CCC/118/2025 · 2025-10-13

C M Poonacha

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40546-DB CCC No. 118 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 118 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SRI M. NAVEENA S/O S. MAHABALAPPA GOWDA NOW WORKING AS MACHNIC GRADE-II ANATHA PURA SECTION SAGARA TALUK, SAGARA - 577 401 SHIMOGA DISTRICT R/AT S.N. NAGAR OPP. VEERABHADRAESHWAR TEMPLE HAVINALLI ROAD, SAGAR. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI RANGANATHA S. JOIS, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI JAYAKUMAR CHAIRMAN & MANGING DIRECTOR M/S MANGALORE ELECTRICAL SUPPLY COMPANY LTD CARIDON PLAZA, V.B. SHETTY CIRCLE MANGALORE - 575 001. Digitally signed by PRABHAKAR SWETHA KRISHNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40546-DB CCC No. 118 of 2025 2. SRI CHANDRASHEKA EXECUTIVE ENGINER (ELECL) MESCOM, DIVISION OFFICE SAGARA - 577 401 SHIMOGA DISTRICT. 3. SRI M.R. JAYADEAVAPPA ASSISTANT CHIEF MANAGER (ADMN) MESCOM, MANGALORE - 575 001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI B.C. PRABHAKAR, ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR THE WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE AND CONTEMPT OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 09.11.2023 IN W.P. NO.6925/2012 (S-RES) VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND DRAW THE EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL SERVICE BENEFITS AND UPHOLD THE DIGNITY AND MAJESTY OF LAW & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40546-DB CCC No. 118 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. None appears for the complainant. 2. The accused has filed the compliance memo confirming that the order for pay fixation of the complainant has been complied with in terms of the order dated 09.11.2023 passed in W.P.No.6925/2012. 3. In view of the above, the present contempt is closed. 4. Pending application stands disposed of. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE KPS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46