Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5479 (PNJ)

THE UDHANWAL PALLEDARI CO OP L C SOCIETY THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED PARSON BIKRAMJEET v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/28793/2025 · 2026-04-23

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-28793-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT The Udhanwal Palledari Co Bikramjeet State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Ms. Armaan Saggar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.6. DEEPAK SIBAL L disposed of, after as such order, declaring the petitioner to be disqualified without following the principles of natural justice 2. In light of the (Annexure P-19) is set aside with liberty to the District Tender Allotment Committee, SBS Nagar to decide the matter afresh but only after granting an opportunity to the petitioner to file a reply to the complai him by respondent No.6 parties. 3. The n through passing of a reasoned order. 2025 (O&M) Sr. No.284 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-17379 CWP-28793 Date of Decision : The Udhanwal Palledari Co-oP L/C Society through its authorized person Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. D.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Ms. Armaan Saggar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. Mr. Nitin Kaushal, Advocate, for respondent No.6. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties agree that this petition can be after setting aside the order dated 20.09.2025 (Annexure P , declaring the petitioner to be disqualified following the principles of natural justice In light of the afore consensus, the order dated 20.09.2025 19) is set aside with liberty to the District Tender Allotment Committee, SBS Nagar to decide the matter afresh but only after granting an opportunity to the petitioner to file a reply to the complai him by respondent No.6 and then granting personal hearing to all affected The needful be done within a period of two weeks from today through passing of a reasoned order. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 17379-CWP-2025 in/and 28793-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.04.2026 oP L/C Society through its authorized person …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI D.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. agree that this petition can be setting aside the order dated 20.09.2025 (Annexure P-19), , declaring the petitioner to be disqualified has been passed following the principles of natural justice. afore consensus, the order dated 20.09.2025 19) is set aside with liberty to the District Tender Allotment Committee, SBS Nagar to decide the matter afresh but only after granting an opportunity to the petitioner to file a reply to the complaint filed against personal hearing to all affected eedful be done within a period of two weeks from today VANDANA 2026.05.01 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28793-2025 4. Disposed of accordingly. 5. Pending application, April 23, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) Disposed of accordingly. Pending application, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No if any, shall also stand disposed of. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.05.01 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document