IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1408 of 2025 ------ Kailash Prasad Yadav, son of Narayan Yadav, aged about 53 years, resident of Purana Dumka Kewat Para, P.O. Dumka, P.S. Dumka, District Dumka, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Choubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bholat Nath Ojha, Spl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No.278 of 2024 instituted under Sections 61(2), 319, 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(1) and 340(2) of the B.N.S, 2023, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the commander of Home guards; after manipulation of the record allotted work to the Home guards even, though, their names were not entered in the register of the year 1984 and after doing their job, the Home guards received their remuneration for the duty discharged by them in an unauthorized manner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner was posted from 08.02.2019 to 28.06.2022 at Ranchi as Company Commander at the District Home guard Office, Ranchi and the alleged occurrence did not take place during the said period. It is next submitted that the petitioner has not made any wrongful gain nor caused any wrongful loss to the State. It is next submitted that the petitioner is still in the service of Jharkhand Police. It is next submitted that the co-accused persons have been given the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 13.01.2025 in A.B.A. No.8184 of 2024. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.25,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Ranchi in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No.278 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/