Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5479 (DEL)

SH. ANUP KUMAR & ANR. v. SH. GAGANDEEP SINGH & ORS.

CS(OS)/371/2025 · 2026-07-22

Avneesh Jhingan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 371/2025, I.A. 13922/2025, I.A. 18906/2026 & I.A. 18907/2026 SH. ANUP KUMAR & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Yash Sharma & Mr. Aditya Dev Sharma, Advs. versus SH. GAGANDEEP SINGH & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms.Tanishka Patel, Mr. Pulkit Dandona & Mr. Ankit Gupta, Advs. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN O R D E R % 22.07.2026 I.A. 18906/2026 1. This application has been filed on behalf of the plaintiffs under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with the following prayers: “a. Permit the Plaintiffs to withdraw the present suit, as settled between the parties; b. Take on record the Settlement Agreement dated 17.02.2026 executed before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari courts, Delhi; c. Refund Court Fees deposited by the Plaintiffs in the present suit. d. Pass any other or further order(s) which this Hon'ble Court This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:15:29 may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The parties have settled their disputes vide settlement agreement dated 17.02.2026. The terms of the settlement agreement reads as follows: “1. It is stated/agreed between the parties that Sh. Kimti Lal Babbar, Sh. Inderpal Singh and Sh. Jitin Ramani repsondents (and also on behalf of Sh. Gagandeep Singh. Sh. Rahul Babbar, Sh. Birenderjit Singh Bindra) shall pay a total Sum of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore only) to the revisionist No. l (also on behalf of revisionist no.2 Smt. Sonu Haswani i.e. wife of Revisionist no. 1) as full and final settlement towards all the disputes/ claims of the revisionists/petitioners. 2. It is stated/agreed by the parties that this is the right to return buy back Flat purchased by revisionist from Sh. Inderpal Singh and Sh. Kimti Lal Babbar and now respondent in buying back the said Flat had agreed to pay Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crore only) in lieu of the same. 3. Out of the total settlement amount Rs. 20,00,000/- (Twenty Lakhs Only) has already been paid by way of demand draft to the revisionist on 29.01.2026. 4. It is agreed between the parties that the respondent shall pay the remaining amount to the 'revisionist in the following manner: Sr. Amount Dated 1. 10,00,000/- On or before 07.03.2026 2. 50,00,000/- On or before 10.04.2026 3. 50,00,000/- On or before 10.05.2026 4. 70,00,000/- On or before 10.06..2026 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:15:29 5. It is stated/agreed between the parties that in case of default/delay in payment of any instalment the condition as imposed by the Ld. Referral Court vide order 29.01.2026 will apply to both the parties, the revisionist shall be at liberty to proceed as per law including but not limited to proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act. 6. It is agreed between the parties that the revisionist shall withdrawn the suit bearing CS(OS) 371/2025, tilted as Anup Kumar & Anr. Vs. Gagandeep Singh & Ors. after receiving the payment mentioned in the scheduled herein and also complaint case no. 979/2023 titled as Anup Kumar & Anr. Vs. Gagandeep Singh & Ors. pending in the court of Ms. Udita Jain Garg. Ld. ACJM. West. THC Court. NDOH 03.04.2026. 7. The parties agree/undertake to remain bound by the terms and conditions as mentioned above. 8. It is stated/agreed between the parties that there is no other complaint, case civil or criminal pending in any judicial or quasi-judicial forum between the parties apart from the present appeal. 9. The contents of the settlement have been explained to both the parties in Hindi language and they have understood the same. Both the parties undertake that they have consented and signed the above settlement after going through and understanding its contents and they have settled the disputes between themselves of their own will and without any coercion, pressure, undue influence, force, misrepresentation or mistake from any quarter.” 3. Learned counsel for the defendants has no objection to the prayers in the application being allowed. 4. Accordingly, the settlement agreement dated 17.02.2026 be taken on record and for the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed. 5. This suit i.e., CS(OS) 371/2025 is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. All pending applications stands This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:15:29 disposed of. 6. Let the court fee deposited by the plaintiffs in the present suit be refunded. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J JULY 22, 2026 ‘ha’ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:15:29