- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44408 CRP No. 119 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 119 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. SMT ROOPA JAGDISH W/O LATE B.R. JAGDISH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT NO.85/C, 6TH MAIN, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE-570 012. 2. SRI KARTHIK B J S/O LATE B R JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT, C-403, OASIS NINE APARTMENTS, 1ST MAIN, 7TH CROSS, ISRO LAYOUT, ISRO LAYOUT BUS STOP BENGALURU SOUTH, J.P. NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 078 3. KUM SHIVANI B J D/O LT B R JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS R/AT NO.85/C, 6TH MAIN, JAYALAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE-570 012. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SWAMINI GANESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SANDEEP S PATIL., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44408 CRP No. 119 of 2025 AND: 1. SRI. N.J. RAVISHANKER S/O. LATE N.A.KUMAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.20, S.B. ROAD, V.V. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 004. …RESPONDENT THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.11.2024 PASSED ON IA NO.25 IN OS NO.6481/2006 ON THE FILED XXIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU., REJECTING THE IA NO.25 FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC., FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as under: "In the above petition it is submit that the suit filed by respondent in O.S.No.6481/2006 has been disposed by the Hon'ble Trial Court vide Order dated 29.03.2025. Therefore, this Honble Court may be pleased to reserve - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44408 CRP No. 119 of 2025 the liberty to the petitioner in the changed circumstances, in view of the O.S.No.6481/2006 been disposed by the Order dated 29.03.2025 to challenge the impugned Order in accordance with law. As per the memo, the proceedings before the Trial Court itself stands disposed off. Accordingly, present Revision Petition is dismissed as it has rendered infractuous. However the grounds urged in the Revision Petition may be urged in the intended appeal. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 10 ct: SG