M/S SUDHAKAR INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. SRI G SAI PRASAD
CC/95/2025 · 2025-10-30
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54778 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54778 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010012762025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Thirty First day of October, The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No. Between:
1. M/s.Sudhakar Infratech Private Limited, repre Director, A.Sudhakar Apartments, Street No.9,
1.Sri G.Sai Prasad, Principal S Irrigation Department, S District. - 522 503. 2.G.K.Subramanyeswara R No-ll, S.P.S.R.Nellore District. 3.Sri Peeyush Kumar, Department, Secretariat, 522 503.
Counsel for the petitioner:
1. Devasri Roshan Kancharla Counsel for the contemnor
1. Sushma Yaganti
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Thirty First day of October, Two Thousand and Twenty Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No. 95 of 2025 M/s.Sudhakar Infratech Private Limited, represented by its Managing A.Sudhakar Reddy, age 46 years, plot no.301, Sai o.9, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad. ... and Principal Secretary to State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, G ara Rao, Executive Engineer, S.P.Division , S.P.S.R.Nellore District. umar, Principal Secretary, Finance and Planning ecretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District ...Contemnors etitioner: Devasri Roshan Kancharla ontemnors:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] wenty Five sented by its Managing ai Sandhya ...Petitioner Pradesh Guntur ivision lanning District - ontemnors
2
BSB, J
C.C.No.95 of 2025
The Court made the following order:
This contempt case is filed under sections 10 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the willful disobedience of the order dated 23.09.2024 passed in W.P.No.17236 of 2024, by the respondents.
2. Ms.K.Indu, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioner represented that the order had been complied and that the petition may be closed.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed.
_______________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :31.10.2025 GRL
3
BSB, J
C.C.No.95 of 2025
147
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
CONTEMPT CASE NO.95 of 2025
Date: 31-10-2025 GRL