- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47604 CRP No. 418 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 418 OF 2022 (IO) BETWEEN: UDAY KUMAR SHETTY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O NANDIYAPPA SHETTY R/AT KURUNDUNJI NADUMARE VILLAGE AURU POST, UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 101 REPRESENTED BY ITS GPA HOLDER SRI. P. RAVINDRA PAI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VAMSHI CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI MUNIYAPPA @ PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHOWDAPPA R/AT ATTIBELE VILLAGE, HOSKOTE HOBLI BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 560 067. 2. SRI. GOPALAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHOWDAPPA HOSKOTE HOBLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 560 067. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47604 CRP No. 418 of 2022 3. SRI. PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHOWDAPPA R/AT HARALURU VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVNAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 4. SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHOWDAPPA R/AT HARALURU VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVNAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 5. SRI. M NARAYANSWAMY AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE MUNICHOWDAPPA R/AT HARALURU VILLAGE CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI DEVNAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 6. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER -2 KIADB WING 49, KHANIJA BHAVAN EAST WING, 5TH FLOOR RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. MURALI BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R5; R1 TO R4 AND R6 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47604 CRP No. 418 of 2022 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.07.2022 PASSED ON IA IN OS No.691/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, REJECTING THE IA FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the revision petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the revision petitioner and in the interest of justice; this Court posted the matter to today as a last chance taking note of the fact that revision petition is of the year 2022 and revision petitioner has not shown any interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, revision petition stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43