Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54773 (PNJ)

LAKHVIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CWP/14307/2020 · 2025-07-30

Aman Chaudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-14307-2020 (O&M) & connected matters -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 241+119 Date of decision: 30.07.2025 1. CWP-14307-2020 (O&M) Lakhvir Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents 2. CWP-21952-2021 (O&M) Shashi Kataria and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents 3. CWP-6718-2024 (O&M) Inderjeet Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others ....Respondents 4. CWP-29646-2024 (O&M) Sandeep Kaur and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents 5. CWP-20533-2025 (O&M) Sandeep Kumar and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents 6. CWP-21623-2025 (O&M) Rajvinder Kaur and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and another ....Respondents AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.05 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14307-2020 (O&M) & connected matters -2- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, Mr. Nishant Maini, Advocate, Mr. Nikhil Singh, Advocate, Ms. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advocate, And Mr. Kartik Kapur, Advocate, for the petitioner(s) (in CWP-14307-2020, CWP-21952-2021, CWP-6718-2024 and CWP-29646-2024). Mr. Pawan Kumar Goklaney, Advocate, and Mr. Ashish Goklaney, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CWP-20533-2025). Mr. Kapil Kakkar, Advocate, for the petitioners (in CWP-21623-2025) Mr. Charanpreet Singh, DAG, Punjab. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY J. (ORAL) 1. Learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that the matter with regard to grant of regular pay scale of Rs.10300-34800+5000 Grade Pay to the petitioner(s) and other 5178 similarly situated employees, from the date of regularization, has been generalized vide order dated 25.07.2025, copy of which is taken on record as Mark-A, and arrears thereof would be released within a period of four months. Intimation, in this regard, sent by the concerned department to the office of the Advocate General Punjab, has been produced and taken on record as Mark-B. 2. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner(s). 3. Disposed of accordingly. 4. Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 30.07.2025 Ajay Prasher Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.08.05 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document