Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131000 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15822 of 2025 Applicant :- Ramjag @ Jaggu Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is named along with five named and one unknown person with the allegation that all the accused persons armed with rod and hockey stick and assaulted the informant and two other persons. General allegation has been made against the applicant for assaulting and there is no specific allegation against him. One co-accused, namely, Molu alias Vivek Yadav, who was also assigned general role has already been enlarged on bail and as the case of applicant is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid co-accused, therefore, applicant may also be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that there is a criminal history of nine cases against the applicant in which he is on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 04.02.2024. 3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant but he could not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 5. Let the applicant-Ramjag @ Jaggu Yadav, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 508 of 2024, under Sections 333, 135, 109, 115(2), 191(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Chaubeypur, District- Varanasi, on executing a personal bond and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 6. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicant in accordance with law. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad