APHC010054592021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 3726/2021 Between: 1. GADDAM SUBBA NARASA RAJU, S/O. GADDAM CHENGAL RAJU, AGE 72 YEARS, 0CC CULTIVATION, R/O. H.NO.1/19, BOMMAVARAM VILLAGE, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, RAILWAY KODURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, RAJAMPET DIVISION, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, OBULAVARIPALLI MANDAL, OBULAVARIPALLI, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac.4-63 cents situated in Sy.No.666/2 of Bommavaram Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due process of law, for the purpose of implementation of NAVARATNALU - PEDALANDARIKI ILLU as illegal, arbitrary, vilolative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the law laid down by this Honourable Court and also contrary to the Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac.4-63 cents situated in Sy.No.666/2 of Bommavaram Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due process of law, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac.4-63 cents situated in Sy.No.666/2 of Bommavaram Village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his land in an extent of Ac.4.63 cents situated in Sy.No.666/2 of Bommavaram village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law, for the purpose of implementation of ‘Navaratnalu Pedalandariki Illu’. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities will follow the due procedure with respect to the subject land. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land in an extent of Ac.4.63 cents situated in Sy.No.666/2 of Bommavaram village, Obulavaripalli Mandal, YSR Kadapa District strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose and if not already used by now for the above said welfare scheme for the poor. If the petitioner is otherwise found to be in possession of the same, he shall be dealt with strictly in accordance with law by giving due opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned including the petitioners, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its 4 own merits. Any dispossession shall not be made except by following the due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 25.09.2025 NNN