Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5477 (PNJ)

GURMEJ SINGH v. BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

CWP/34855/2025 · 2026-03-05

Gurvinder Singh Gill, Ramesh Kumari

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 116 GURMEJ S BAR COUN CORAM: Present :  1. The petition issued by B nomination several such pursuant t Hon’ble Sup such petition had been d under;- th fe el IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP Date MEJ SINGH Versus COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANOTH AM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE  HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE Mr. Parikshit Singh, Advocate Mr. Ranvir S. Chauhan, Advoc ****    , J. (oral) etitioner by way of instant petition, by Bar Council of India prescribing nation fee for contesting election to t al such writ petitions have been filed ant thereto, some transfer petitions ble Supreme Court of India wherein, v petitions including the present petition een dismissed. The relevant extract “ In this view of the matter, we that there is no necessity for any fee structure prescribed for the election of the State Bar Counci UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH CWP No.34855 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.03.2026 …. Petitioner NOTHER …. Respondent    ICE     ocate and Advocate for the petitioner. , has challenged the notification cribing an amount of 1.25 lakh as n to the Bar Council. We find that n filed in various High Courts and titions were also filed before the rein, vide order dated 05.02.2026, all etition, were taken on the Board, and xtract from the said order reads as r, we are of the considered opinion any High Court to interfere in the r the purpose of conducting the uncil. These transfer petitions are ation h as that and the 6, all and as ion the the are JYOTI 2026.03.06 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document al C di 2. In view of t dismissed, petition stan 3. Pending app    CWP No.34855 of 2025 allowed. All the relevant cases p Courts are taken on board and dismissed.” w of the aforesaid order wherein the ssed, no further order is required to on stands disposed of. ng application, if any, also stands disp   Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether reportable : 5 -2- ses pending before different High and the same are, accordingly, in the instant petition already stands red to be passed. Accordingly, the s disposed of.           Yes/No. Yes/No igh ly, tands , the JYOTI 2026.03.06 10:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document