Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54761 (AP)

N MOHAN NAIDU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CC/2068/2025 · 2025-12-04

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010398612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Fifth day of December, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No.2068 of 2025 Between: 1. N.Mohan Naidu, S/o.L resident of 2-104, Rachagunneri village, Srikalahasthi, Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh – 517641. 2. Bollineni Jaganadham Naidu, S/o. 48 years, resident of 2 Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh 1. Sri M.Bhanu Prakash Reddy, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasthi Mandal, Tirupathi District Counsel for the petitioner 1. Tirumala Vidya Charan Counsel for the contemnor: 1. Kalyan Chakravarthy.R IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Friday, the Fifth day of December, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Contempt Case No.2068 of 2025 Late Ramachandhra Naidu, aged about 61 years, 104, Rachagunneri village, Srikalahasthi, Tirupathi, Andhra Bollineni Jaganadham Naidu, S/o.Late Doraswamy Naidu, aged about 48 years, resident of 2-77-1, Rachagunneri village, Srikalahasthi, Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh – 517641. ...Petitioners and Sri M.Bhanu Prakash Reddy, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Srikalahasthi Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...Contemnor Counsel for the petitioners: Tirumala Vidya Charan Counsel for the contemnor: Kalyan Chakravarthy.R IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Friday, the Fifth day of December, Two Thousand and Twenty Five u, aged about 61 years, 104, Rachagunneri village, Srikalahasthi, Tirupathi, Andhra Naidu, aged about 1, Rachagunneri village, Srikalahasthi, ...Petitioners Sri M.Bhanu Prakash Reddy, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Contemnor 2 BSB, J C.C.No.2068 of 2025 The Court made the following order: This contempt case is filed under sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for the willful disobedience of the order dated 27.01.2025 in W.P.No.5836 of 2024 by the respondent and to summon and punish the respondent. 2. Ms.K.Soundarya, learned counsel representing the counsel for the petitioners represented that no further order is required. 3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this contempt case shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated :05.12.2025 GRL 3 BSB, J C.C.No.2068 of 2025 116 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI Contempt Case No.2068 of 2025 Date: 05-12-2025 GRL