Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29121 WP No. 4273 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 4273 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MR. SHANKAR SUVARANA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O. AITHU POOJARY, 4TH CROSS, NARIKERE, AMBALPADY, UDUPI-576 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOVINDARAJU K., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.
2.
THE ADDL. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND ADDL. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAJATHADRI, MANIPAL, UDUPI-576 104.
3.
THE COMMISSIONER UDUPI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, UDUPI-576 101.
4.
MAHESH SHETTY AGE: MAJOR S/O. LATE SADANANDA SHETTY, R/AT NO.205, PANCHAJANYA RESIDENCY, PARKALA, UDUPI-576 104.
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29121 WP No. 4273 of 2017
5.
THE TAHSILDAR UDUPI TALUK, UDUPI-576 101.
6.
M/S. TOTAL OIL INDIA PVT. LTD., NO.138 G, 1ST FLOOR, RAHEJA PARAMOUNT RESIDENCY ROAD, BANGALORE-560 025.
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR
7.
KARNATAKA FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES PANDESHWAR FIRE STATION, TELECOM HOUSE ROAD, MANGALORE-575 001, REPRESENTED BY CHIEF FIRE OFFICER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1, 2, 5 AND 7;
SRI. K. PRASAD HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.3;
SRI. T.I.ABDULLA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.4;
NOTICE IS SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT CONSTRUCTION OF AUTO LPG STATION IN SY.NO.76/14C3 AND SY.NO.76/15C3 LAND SITUATED IN KIDIYOOR VILLAGE OF UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT, AS ILLEGAL, CONTRARY TO SECTION 14A OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1961 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29121 WP No. 4273 of 2017
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29