Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54753 (AP)

Dafedar Fhayaz Basha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/27906/2025 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010537742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27906/2025 Between: 1. DAFEDAR FHAYAZ BASHA,, S/O. KHASIM BASHA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO. 10/103, BEPARI STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 516434. 2. S. TAJUDDIN,, S/O. GAFFAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.9/3, TALARI STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 516434. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO DEPARTMENT OF HOME, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAMMALAMADUGU URBAN POLICE STATION, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SYED TAHIR PEERAN KHADRY, S/O SYED SHAH GHOUSE PEERAN KHADRY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, D.NO.20/43, MAHABOOB NAGAR STREET, JAMMALAMADUGU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MASALEGAR HIDAYATHULLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents more particularly respondent nos.2 and 3 for not acting upon the petitioners complaints dt. 16.08.2025 and 18.08.2025 as against the 4th respondent for committing 2 forgery which is being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequentially direct the respondent nos.2 and 3 to initiate action as against the 4th respondent by acting upon the petitioners complaints.” 2. Heard Sri Masalegar Hidayathulla, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that they have received the representation of the petitioners and it is under the process of enquiry. 4. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27906 of 2025 Dt.14.10.2025 Asr