ASHABAI SURESH PAWAR AND ORS v. VAKIL BAIG S/O SARDAR BAIG AND ANR
CA/1420/2021 · 2025-02-03
Shri Sandipkumar C More
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5475 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5475 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
(1) 30-CA-1420-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1420 OF 2021 IN FAST/810/2021 ASHABAI SURESH PAWAR AND ORS ….Applicants VERSUS VAKIL BAIG S/O SARDAR BAIG AND ANR …..Respondents ….. Advocate for Applicants : Mr. R. B. Ade ….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATED : 03 FEBRUARY , 2025
ORDER:-
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants/claimants.
2. Respondents despite service remained absent.
3. The delay is only of 55 days and therefore, considering short period of delay the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.
4. The appeal be registered after removal of office objections, if any.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) Y.S. Kulkarni