APHC010627432014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7424/2014 Between: 1. BARATAM KUTUMBA RAO, S/O.RAMANAYYA, RESIDENT OF CHINNA BARATAM STREET, SRIKAKULAM. 2. BARATAM VISHWANATHAM, S/O.RAMANAYYA, RESIDENT OF CHINNA BARATAM STREET, SRIKAKULAM. 3. BARATAM KANTHA RAO, S/O.RAMANAYYA, RESIDENT OF CHINNA BARATAM STREET, SRIKAKULAM. 4. BARATAM RAM PRASADA RAO, S/O RAMANAYYA, RESIDENT OF CHINNA BARATAM STREET, SRIKAKULAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. BHARATH PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, Rep. by its Senior Divisional Manager, Secunderabad. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent corporation in continuing to squat on the petitioners property an extent of 343.55 sq.yds in Sy.No.108 Revenue survey No.182/87 of Srikakulam Town where the respondent has its petrol pump in spite of the dismissal of the suit of the respondent in O.S.60/1990 on the file of the II Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Srikakulam where it sought for extension of lease period and in spite of the 2 JS,J W.P.No.7424/2014 dismissal of its appeal which became final as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unbecoming to an organ of the State and to consequently direct the respondent to immediately vacate the said premises and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 9203 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an interim direction against the respondent to vacate the property of the petitioners in Sy.No.108 Revenue survey No.182/87 of Srikakulam Town where the respondent located the petrol bunk during the pendency of this Writ Petition. IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 41458 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SARVA BHOUMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 2. O MANOHER REDDY 3 JS,J W.P.No.7424/2014 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioners. On the earlier occasion also i.e., on 03.09.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.09.2025 KAS