Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5474 (UTT)

DR. ARDHANA ARYA v. STATE OF UTTARKAHND

WPSB/19/2017 · 2025-04-23

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 19/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. C.K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. P.S. Bisht, Additional CSC, for the State. (2) Learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and it may be dismissed as such. (3) Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.4.2025 Pr