( 2025:HHC:7963 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 23 of 2025. Decided on : 27 th March, 2025. Pooja Sharma ...Petitioner. Versus Rohit Sharma & Anr. ....Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate, vice Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Prayer made in the petitioner is to transfer HMA Case No. 289 of 2024, titled as Rohit Sharma vs. Pooja Sharma & Anr., from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Una, District Una, H.P. to Court of Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bilaspur, H.P. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has stated that his client has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed. 3. In this view of the matter, the petition is allowed. Accordingly, HMA Case No. 289 of 2024, titled as Rohit 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2025:HHC:7963 ) Sharma vs. Pooja Sharma & Anr., is ordered to be transferred from the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Una, District Una, H.P. to the Court of Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bilaspur, H.P. The parties are directed to appear before the transferee Court on 23.04.2025 either in person or through their respective counsel. 4. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 27th March, 2025. (jai)