(118) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-PIL-106-2025 (O&M) Date of decision:- 08.05.2025 Ram Kumar ...Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Haryana and others ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present:- Mr. C.L. Pawar, Advocate, Mr. Rubal Pawar, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Badal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana, with Ms. Khushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, for the respondents. * * * * SHEEL NAGU, C.J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition, which is styled as Public Interest Litigation (PIL), revolves around ‘Har Ghar Jal Yojna’, but the said scheme has neither been discussed, nor attached to the petition. 2. The petition is sketchy and, thus, cannot be entertained. 3. The petition, accordingly, stands dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file the same afresh, if so advised. (SHEEL NAGU) CHIEF JUSTICE (SUMEET GOEL) JUDGE 08.05.2025 Amodh Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No AMODH SHARMA 2025.05.09 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgement