Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54732 (CHH)

AVI PATHAK @ LUCKY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/87/2021 · 2025-10-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51616-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 87 of 2021 Avi Pathak @ Lucky Age 17 Years, Through Father- Gopi Pathak, (Natural Guardian For Minor) R/o- Pulpara, Ramgopal Tiwari, Ward P.S. Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, P.S.- Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ajju Manikpuri S/o Dilip Manikpuri Aged About 18 Years R/o Kharripara, P.S.- Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Devlina Maity, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangarsh Pandey, GA Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice RAHUL JHA Digitally signed by RAHUL JHA Date: 2025.10.16 17:08:16 +0530 2 16/10/2025 1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash FIR No. 01/2021 dated 02/01/2021 registered for commission of offence U/s- 294, 323, 34, 452, 506 of IPC at Police Station- Mungeli, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh, in the interest of justice” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no contact with the petitioner as he is not responding. 3. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest his interest in pursuing this petition, therefore, this CRMP is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Sourabh/Rahul