- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35510 WP No. 15368 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15368 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. M/S TRUPTI WATERS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HANEHALLI VILLAGE, KURADI POST, UDUPI - 576210. 2. MR. PRASHANT POOJARI, S/O KRISHNA POOJARI, RESIDING AT POORNIMA NILAYA, HANEHALLI VILLAGE, KURADI POST, UDUPI 576210. 3. MRS. PAVITHRA A.G, D/O GANGAYA POOJARI, RESIDING AT NO.1-53, TYPE 2 QUARTERS, CPCRI, VITTAL, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT 574211. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MURALIDHARA G S.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35510 WP No. 15368 of 2025 AND: 1. CANARA BANK KANCHCHUR VILLAGE BRANCH, BARKUR, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576210. 2. ASSET RECOVERY MANAGEMENT BRANCH, CANARA BANK BUILDING, HAMPANKATTA, BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALURU - 575001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VINAY BHAT.,ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO FORTHWITH HALT THE SALE PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES ANNEXURE-G; QUASHING THE IMPUGNED SALE NOTICE DATED 09.05.2025 (ANNEXURE-G) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35510 WP No. 15368 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo which reads as under: The above named petitioners most respectfully submits before this Hon'ble Court as follows: The petitioners filed the above case against the Respondent, now the Petitioners wish to do not proceed with the above case, they are withdrawing the above case hence this Hon'ble Court may dismiss the above case, kindly dismiss as not press and kindly give direction to the office to handed over the original documents to petitioner in the interest of justice. In view of the afore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. The office is directed to return the original documents to the petitioner after retaining photocopies thereof. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE SA ct:sr