CRM-M No.338 IN THE 251 Rajesh Kumar Devi Chand and CORAM : HON Present: Mr. for t Non *** NAMIT KUMA 1. The seeking quashing court of learned No.COMI/4/2018 IPC (Annexure prosecution. 2. In p Garg, Advocate 01.04.2024, how today. 3. Lear appearing for the down the next da to the petitioner 3858 of 2023 -1- THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of De Versus d and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate for the petitioners. None for respondents No.1 and 2. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The instant petition has been fil ashing of the order dated 14.06.2022 learned SDJM, Khanna vide which 4/2018 under Sections 420, 467, 468, exure P-2) filed by the petitioner ha In pursuance of notice of motion or ocate had put in appearance on behal , however, no one is present on beh Learned counsel for the petitioner s for the petitioner before the Court be date of hearing of the complaint an tioner regarding the same, due to whic NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH M No.33858 of 2023 e of Decision:10.02.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents AMIT KUMAR en filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C 6.2022 (Annexure P-1) passed by the which Criminal Complaint bearing , 468, 471, 506, 294, 120-B and 354- ner has been dismissed for want of tion order dated 17.07.2023, Mr. Dixi behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 ioner submits that clerk of the counse urt below inadvertently had not noted laint and thus, no intimation was given to which, neither the petitioner nor his s r.P.C. by the earing -A ant of . Dixit d 2 on and 2 ounsel t noted s given nor his PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.13 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh CRM-M No.338 counsel could ap these circumstan non-prosecution. 4. In th petitioner is not i the impugned or SDJM, Khanna by the petitioner 5. Part Khanna on 24.02 and 2 as directed 6. A co information and n February 10, 20 Pankaj* 3858 of 2023 -2- uld appear before the Court on 18.05 mstances, the complaint filed by the ution. In this view of the matter, the non is not intentional and consequently, th ned order dated 14.06.2022 (Annexu anna is set aside, subject to payment o tioner to respondents No.1 and 2 in equ Parties are directed to appear befo 24.02.2025, on which date, costs sh rected by this Court. A copy of this order be served upo n and necessary compliance. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 18.05.2022 and 14.06.2022. It is in y the petitioner has been dismissed for e non appearance of the complainant tly, the present petition is allowed and nnexure P-1) passed by the learned ment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be paid in equal share. r before the Court of learned SDJM sts shall be paid to respondents No.1 d upon Mr. Dixit Garg, Advocate for (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No It is in for ainant- ed and earned e paid SDJM, s No.1 ate for PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.13 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh