APHC010108092015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 711 OF 2015 Between: 1. Chittimalla Laxmaiah, S/o Guravaiah, Aged: 39 years, Occ: Un- Employee, R/o. D.No. 2-482, PTI Colony, Gurazala Village and Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of A P Rep by its Principal Secretary, Schedule Caste and Schedule Welfare Department, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collecter cum Chairmen District Schedule, cast service Co-operative Society Ltd, Guntur District, at Guntur, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, by declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing impugned proceedings vide. R.C.No. 327/2010/SC/A-3 date: 23-12-2014 by cancelling the lease agreement of the petitioner situated S.C.No.I 1946/1.2P Extend. Ac. 0.201/2 guntas to run the fly Ash bricks manufacturing unit as illegal, arbitrary, violate of article 14,19 and 21of Constitution of India and against the principals of natural SRK, J W.P.No.711 of 2015 2 justice consequently set aside the proceeding of the 2nd respondent issued vide. R.C.No. 327/2010/SC/A-3 date: 23-12- 2014. Counsel for the Petitioner: CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondents: GANDRALA RATHNA KUMAR SC For APSCCFC LTD Counsel for the Respondents: B PRAKASAM ( SC FOR AP APSCCFC) SRK, J W.P.No.711 of 2015 3 The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed questioning the proceedings in RC No.327/2010/SC/A-3, dated 23.12.2014, of 2nd respondent, cancelling the lease agreement of the petitioner to run fly ash bricks manufacturing unit in Survey No.1946/1-2P, Ac.0.20 ½ guntas of Gurazala village. 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Sri Y. Bharat Kumar Reddy, learned counsel, representing Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:21.11.2025 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.711 of 2015 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.711 of 2015 Date:21.11.2025 Nsr