1 APHC010418242019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 20089/2019 Between: 1. BHATRAJU KRISHNA MURTHY MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, GUNTUR, REG.NO-273/2000, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT AND CORRESPONDENT, B. CHITTA RANJAN DAS, NALLA CHERUVU, GUNTUR. 2. B. CHITTA RANJAN DAS,, S/O KRISHNA MURTHY, 75 YEARS, SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, CHENCHU AIDED UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOL, NALLA CHERUVU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF A.P. REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, IBRAHIM PATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. V N MASTANAIAH, ADDL. DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, AND ENQUIRY OFFICER, DIRECTOR OF STATE LIBRARIAN, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DEMOCRATIC TEACHER FEDERATION, GUNTUR BRANCH, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT K. RAVINDRA BABU, SCHOOL ASST., G.C.R.S.S. JUNIOR COLLEGE, SANGADI GUNTA, GUNTUR, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. S LAKSHMANA REDDY, GENERAL SECRETARY AND DEMODRATIC -TEACHERS FEDERATION, MARKANDEYA BHAVAN, 1/13, BRODIPET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. MANDAL EDUCATIONAL OFFICER URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. RESPONDENT NO.8 IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT 23.04.2025 VIDE IA NO.2/2021 IN WP NO.20089/2019 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, or order more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in appointing 3rd respondent as an enquiry Officer though with regarding to the same subject matter Writ Petition filed by the 6th respondent is dismissed as illegal (2) to declare the action of the respondents 1 to 4 amounting to double jeopardy as per article 20 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the appointment of the 3rd respondent as enquiry Officer by the 1st and 2nd respondents, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 not to proceed further to conduct enquiry pursuant to the Government Memo.No.577220/PS/A2/2017, dated 5- 12¬2017, pending disposal of the W.P. before this Hon'ble Court, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dated 10.03.2020 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.20089 of 2019 and to dismiss the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2021 3 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to permit the petitioners to implead "The District Collector , Collectorate, Guntur, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh" as Respodnent No.8 in the above Writ Petition No.20089 of 2019 and in all miscellaneous petitions, and to pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION 2. P SAI SURYA TEJA The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.20089 OF 2019 ORDER: Ms. S.Mahathi, learned counsel representing Sri G.Sridhar, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that a letter was addressed to the writ petitioner for instructions. But, he did not come forward. 2. This writ petition has been coming for the last four adjournments under the caption ‘for dismissal’, but the writ petitioner did not come forward to prosecute the case. It appears that the writ petitioner has no interest to prosecute the writ petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24.11.2025 SSA 5 54 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:20089 OF 2019 Date: 24.11.2025 SSA