APHC010301152020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19976/2020 Between: 1. KAYAM PRAKASH REDDY, S/O RANGA REDDY AGE. 44 YEARS R/O KAYAM (V), VADAMALAPETA (M), CHITTOR DISTRICT 2. M. MOHAN, S/O JAYA CHANDRA AGE. 21 YEARS R/O SUNDARAMMA KANDRIGA (V), CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. M KUPPUSWAMI, S/O.(LATE) ELLAIAH AGE. 28 R/O KAYAM (V), VADAMALAPETA (M), CHITTOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVT,OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOR DISTRICT 3. SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, VALAMALAPETA PS, TIRUPATI URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DR D V RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the high-handed acts of the Respondent No. 3 i.e., implicating the Petitioners in false case vide FIR No. 207 of 2020 to act in the interest of land grabbers, involving in civil matters etc that depriving the Petitioners of their fundamental Rights of personal liberty as illegal, arbitrary, violation of various judgments of apex court and article 21 of Constitution of India Consequently, direct the competent authority to conduct a 2 departmental enquiry and to take disciplinary action against the Respondent No. 3 in accordance with law and pass such other order.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint of Respondent No.4, a case in Crime No.207 of 2020 on the file of Vadamalapeta Police Station has been registered against the Petitioners for the offences under Sections 342 and 324 read with 34 IPC. It is further submitted that the Police after due investigation, filed charge sheet in the said crime which is numbered as C.C.No.2 of 2021. It is submitted that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Dr.D.V.Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to follow due process of law in connection with the case registered against the Petitioners and also not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:14.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19976 of 2020 Dt.14.10.2025 Dinesh