Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5470 (JHR)

AMAR NATH SAH v. MINOR SIDDHARTHA SAH

C.R./4/2024 · 2025-03-03

Rajesh Kumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No.4 of 2024 1. AmarNathSah 60 years, 2. Badri nathSah 62 years 3. Kedar NathSah, 57 years, all sons of late Narayan Sah, R/o Hirapur Police Line, P.O., P.S. - Dhanbad & District – Dhanbad. …… Petitioners Versus Minor Siddhartha Sah, S/o Sri Amar NathSah, represented through his mother Sarita Kumar Madesia, 48 years, wife of Sri Amar NathSah, Resident of Hirapur in front of Police Line, P.O., P.S. and District – Dhanbad, Present R/o Main Road Kenduadih, P.O. - Kusunda, P.S. - Kenduadih, District – Dhanbad. …... Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : None For the O.P. : -------- 06/Dated: 03 rd March, 2025 1. On repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2. It appears that the present civil revision application has been filed against the order dated 18.10.2023, passed by the court of learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division) – VII, Dhanbad in Original (Partition) Suit No.343 of 2019, whereby petition filed under Order 7 Rule 11 of the C.P.C in the O.S. (Partition) No.343 of 2019 has been rejected. 3. It further appears that the present case has been filed on 05.02.2024 and it is still under defects. Even court fee has not been filed. 4. Earlier, time was granted to remove the defects. Today, nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the present civil revision application stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/-