Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54692 (PNJ)

AMARJIT KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/25474/2025 · 2025-05-27

Sukhvinder Kaur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 120 CRM-M-25474-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.05.2025. Amarjit Kaur ...Petitioner. Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents. *** CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ....... Present: Mr. Vishnu Dutt, Advocate for the petitioner. *** SUKHVINDER KAUR , J. Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, is for issuance of direction to respondent No.2 to conduct the fair and impartial investigation in representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P1) moved against respondents No.3 and 4, who along with 8-10 other police officials, forcibly picked up the petitioner and her brother-in-law from the house and illegally detained in the Police Post Jagatpuri on 19.04.2025. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that on 19.04.2025, respondents No.3 and 4 along with 8-10 other police officials forcibly entered into the house of the petitioner at around 7/7:30 A.M. and enquired about the son of the petitioner and misbehaved with her. They slapped the petitioner and used filthy language with her. Thereafter, the petitioner along with her brother-in-law were forcibly picked up and illegally detained by the police officials of the Police Post Jagatpuri, without any order of any Court, which clearly shows that respondents No.3 and 4 in collusion with the other KOMAL 2025.05.27 17:34 I attest to the accuracy of this document CRM-M-25474-2025 (O&M) -2- police officials have disobeyed the process of law by misusing their official power. Thereafter, the petitioner moved representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P1) before respondent No.2, but no action on the same has been taken till date. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he would be satisfied if the representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-1), which had already been moved by the petitioner is looked into. Notice of motion. Ms. Gagandeep Kaur, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice and submitted that he has no objection if the aforesaid representation dated 21.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) is looked into. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Police Station Haibowal, Ludhiana, to look into the aforesaid representation and to take appropriate action, if any required at the earliest. Disposed of. (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE 27.05.2025. Komal Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/ No Whether reportable? : Yes/ No KOMAL 2025.05.27 17:34 I attest to the accuracy of this document