COCP-2535 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 Gurpreet Singh and others Bikramjit Singh Shergill CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. 01.02.2024 (Annexure P CWP-18106 Road Transport Corp. and others under:- 2. the petitioner duly complied with and R-1) has been 2535-2015 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Gurpreet Singh and others Versus Bikramjit Singh Shergill CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Mr.Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner 01.02.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 18106-2021 titled as ‘Gurpreet Singh and others Road Transport Corp. and others’, the respondents have been directed as “5. In view of the above, respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of overtime allowance as narrated in the representation dated 04.06.2021 (Annexure P-5) by p within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled for the grant of overtime allowance, the necessary benefit shall be released to them within a period month thereafter.” At the very outset, it is fairly admitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the aforesaid direction/order reproduced above duly complied with and a speaking order dated 1) has been passed by the respondent. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2535-2015 Date of Decision: 27.08.2025 .… Petitioners .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Mr.Vikas Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. . Anupam Singla, Advocate for the respondent. for the petitioners submits vide order dated -ordinate Bench of this Court in Gurpreet Singh and others vs. The PEPSU the respondents have been directed as , respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of overtime allowance as narrated in the representation dated 5) by passing a speaking order within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled for the grant of overtime allowance, the necessary benefit shall be released to them within a period of one At the very outset, it is fairly admitted by learned counsel for the aforesaid direction/order reproduced above stands speaking order dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure vide order dated Bench of this Court in The PEPSU the respondents have been directed as , respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the claim of the petitioners for grant of overtime allowance as narrated in the representation dated assing a speaking order within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, the petitioners are found entitled for the grant of overtime allowance, the necessary of one At the very outset, it is fairly admitted by learned counsel for 28.08.2024 (Annexure RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-2535 3. has been rendered infruc with liberty to the petitioner 28.08.2024 (Annexure R 4. having been rendered 5. speaking order 6. 7. 27.08.2025 rishu 2535-2015 -2- Accordingly, learned counsel submits that been rendered infructutous and may be disposed of as such, liberty to the petitioners to challenge aforesaid speaking order dated 28.08.2024 (Annexure R-1) in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present having been rendered infructuous. The petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the afore speaking order (Annexure R-1), in accordance with law. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 27.08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Accordingly, learned counsel submits that the instant petition and may be disposed of as such, however, to challenge aforesaid speaking order dated 1) in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as would be at liberty to challenge the aforesaid , in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No the instant petition however, to challenge aforesaid speaking order dated as said RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.29 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.