Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54685 (AP)

YATRA SEKHAR REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20144/2023 · 2025-12-08

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010391602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20144/2023 Between: 1. YATRA SEKHAR REDDY, S/O. SWAMY REDDY, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.2-1-1/9, 25TH WARD, PRAKASH NAGAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.(ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM) 2. YATRA RAMBABU REDDY,, S/O. SWAMY REDDY, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.2-1-1/9, 25TH WARD, PRAKASH NAGAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.(ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM) 3. YATRA NAGI REDDY, , S/O. SWAMY REDDY, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.D.NO.2-1-1/9, 25TH WARD, PRAKASH NAGAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT.(ERSTWHILE PRAKASAM) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT AT BAPATLA. 3. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , CHIRALA DIVISION, CHIRALA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIRALA I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHIRALA TOWN, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. KAMENEDI SEETHAMMA, W/O. MALAKONDAIAH, AGED 61 YEARS, OCC.. VEGETABLE VENDOR, R/O. 2ND WARD, GANDHINAGAR, CHIRALA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent 4 in interfering into my personal life and liberty and settling the civil disputes at the instance of 5th respondent, which illegal, irregular, arbitrary, irrational, without any authority of law and contrary to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1976 and violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 4 not to interfere in any manner with petitioners' personal life and liberty and settle the civil disputes at the instance of 5th respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere in any manner with petitioners' personal life and liberty and settle the civil disputes at the instance of 5th respondent, pending disposal of main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGA PRAVEEN VANKAYALAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20144 of 2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent 4 in interfering into my personal life and liberty and settling the civil disputes at the instance of 5th respondent, which illegal, irregular, arbitrary, irrational, without any authority of law and contrary to the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1976 and violative of Articles 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the respondents 4 not to interfere in any manner with petitioners' personal life and liberty and settle the civil disputes at the instance of 5th respondent and pass.…” 2. None represented for the petitioner. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on oral instructions, would submit that, the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent, except under due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.12.2025. TVN HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20144 of 2023 Dated.09.12.2025 TVN 294