Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54680 (AP)

Vemula Keerthi, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14797/2019 · 2025-11-23

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010317722019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14797/2019 Between: 1. VEMULA KEERTHI, W/O PERAIAH BABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- HOUSE-WIFE, RIO D.NO.51-2-17, NEAR OLD PANCHAYAT OFFICE, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 7. K ESWAR RAO, S/O NAME NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, MYLAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action, things and deeds of Respondents in harassing the Petitioner and her husband by entering into their house illegally and high handedly without any Power, Authority or Warrant in the night timings by terrorizing the Petitioner and her children, which is illegal, irregular, arbitrary, against to the personal liberty as guaranteed by Constitution of India, in violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the personal lives of the Petitioner and her family members by directing 6th Respondent S.I. of Police, who is Station House Officer of 5th Respondent Police Station and to pay damages of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the Petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents especially Respondents 6 & 7 not to harass the Petitioner or her family members in any manner by entering into their house or through phones pending disposal of the main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14797 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri T.Manikanta, learned counsel representing Sri Narasimha Rao Gudiseva, learned counsel for the writ petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 24.11.2025 Pmk 4 05 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14797 OF 2019 Date: 24.11.2025 Pmk