IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.644 of 2025 and connected matters. Decided on: 10th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ 1. CWP No. 644 of 2025 Chuni Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …..Respondents. ______________________________________________________ 2. CWP No. 645 of 2025 Hair Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …..Respondents. ______________________________________________________ 3. CWP No. 646 of 2025 Bhim Sain …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …..Respondents ______________________________________________________ 4. CWP No. 648 of 2025 Jai Chand …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …..Respondents. ______________________________________________________ - 2 - 5. CWP No. 739 of 2025 Lottam Ram …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors …..Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Jia Lal Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta and Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocates General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N.Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents in all the writ petitions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioners have filed representations for the redressal of their grievances raised in the respective writ petitions, but till date the same have not been adjudicated upon; Petitioners would be satisfied in case competent 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 3 - authority is directed to decide the representations in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, these writ petitions are disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioners. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 10, 2025 R.Atal