APHC010508012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27252/2025 Between: 1. VADDE SARASWATHI, W/O. V RAMANNA, AGED 50 YEARS, R/O.H.NO.LO/L/3A,VADDE STREET, MADDIKERA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THEINSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SRI R VIJAY KUMAR NAIK, SUB- INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MADDIKERA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. SRI P PULI SHEKHAR, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PATTIKONDA RURAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAZID KALLUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to pass an appropriate order or writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the Respondent No.2 to 5 in considering and disposing of the representations dated 28.07.2025 and 13.08.2025 submitted by the Petitioner for 2 initiating the disciplinary action against the Respondent No.6 and 7 as Arbitrary, Illegal and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to 5 to consider and dispose of representations dated 28.07.2025 and 13.08.2025 submitted by the Petitioner and initiate disciplinary action against the Respondent No.6 and 7.” 2. Heard Sri Sazid Kallur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, based on the complaints made by the petitioner, five crimes have been registered. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would further submit that two crimes have also been registered against the petitioner. The husband of the petitioner is a journalist, and they are not cooperating with the investigation. The present petition has been filed to overcome the investigation process by making allegations against the police officers, seeking action against them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that unless they filed a complaint against the police officer, no case was registered against any wrongful dowers. After filing the complaint, the petitioner was threatened by the police. Therefore, it is prayed that a direction be issued to consider their representation. 5. In the light of the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent No.5 is directed to look into the representation of the petitioner and take appropriate decision over the matter according to governing Rules and Law. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.10.2025 Asr 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27252 of 2025 Dt.07.10.2025 Asr