Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54662 (CHH)

SMT. DALI GUPTA v. SHYAMU GUPTA

TPC/155/2024 · 2025-07-03

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:30640 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TPC No. 155 of 2024 1 - Smt. Dali Gupta W/o. Shyamu Gupta Aged About 34 Years R/o. Ward No. 51, House No. 164, Subhash Colony, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Minor Samriddhi Gupta D/o. Shyamu Gupta Aged About 14 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Dali Gupta, W/o. Shyamu Gupta, Caste - Agrawal, R/o. Dharamjaigarh Neeche Para, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) At Present - R/o. Ward No. 51, House No. 164, Subhash Colony, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Ku. Shivangi Gupta D/o. Shyamu Gupta Aged About 11 Years Minor Through Legal Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Dali Gupta, W/o. Shyamu Gupta, Caste - Agrawal, R/o. Dharamjaigarh Neeche Para, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) At Present - R/o. Ward No. 51, House No. 164, Subhash Colony, Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Applicant versus 1 - Shyamu Gupta S/o. Late Tejpal Gupta Aged About 40 Years Caste - Agrawal, R/o. Dharamjaigarh Neeche Para, P.S. Dharamjaigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.07.07 11:33:15 +0530 2 For applicant : Mr. Atul Kumar Gabhel, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Ajeet Yadav, Adv. For Respondent : None. ( Hon'ble Shri N aresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J) Order on Board 4-7-2025 1. Applicant/wife has preferred this TPC under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code (in short 'CPC') for transfer of Case No. 48/2021 (Smt. Dali Gupta and ors. Vs. Shyam Gupta) pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dharamjaigarh, Distt. Raigarh to Court, Bilaspur. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court. Therefore, he does not want to press this petition. 3. In view of above, this transfer petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE