SMT. JYOTI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/14311/2025 · 2025-05-13
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80023 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14311 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Jyoti And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Phool Chandra Saroj Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. By bare perusal of the records, it reveals that both the petitioners are residing at Delhi, even the application which has been preferred at the behest of the petitioners for seeking police protection is also addressed to Deputy Commissioner of Police, Delhi itself, but at the same time direction has been sought through the instant petition in favour of respondent nos. 2 and 3, who are arrayed as respondents under the capacity of Superintendent of Police, Kasganj and Station House Officer, Police Station Amapur, District Kasganj.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that when there is no cause of action arises at Kasganj, the instant petition is not maintainable, so far as regarding seeking police protection in favour of the petitioners are concerned, the same may be prayed before the Hon'ble High Court who is having territorial jurisdiction over Deputy Commissioner of Police, Delhi.
5. In view thereof, present petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad