M/s. Ramachandra Roofing Sheets Manufacturing Industry, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/2322/2025 · 2025-07-03
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5466 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5466 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010046242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2322 OF 2025 Between: M/s. Ramachandra Roofing Sheets Manufacturing Industry, Represented by its Propx. Smt. M.Manisha Reddy, D.No.4-314, BC Colony, Baireddypalli Village, Chittoor- 517 415. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary Industries and Commerce Department Velgapudi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Chief General Manager (AM), A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited, Head Office, Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Zonal Manager, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Zonal Office, D.No.22-1124, SBI Colony, 2nd Main, K.R.Palli, Puttur Road, Chittoor. 4. The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, A.P. Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Mangalagiri. Secretariat Buildings, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus
declaring the proceeding Lr.No.42050/APIIC/MSME in Gandrajupalli/Chittoor/2021 dated 08.01.2025 wherein the 3rd Respondent rejecting for extension of time for impiementation of the project without supplying the copy of the minutes of EOT Committee dated 17.12.2024 contrary to law and further direct the till 16.07.2025 for implementation of the as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and 3rd Respondent to extend the time project. lA NO: 1 OF Petition under Section 151 CPC in the affidavit filed i praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation dated 08.01.2025 of the Petitioner for extension of time for iimplementation of the project till then not to take any coercive steps for dispossessing the Petitioner from the land allotted by the Respondents in Plot No.129, 130, 131, 132, 133 140, 141, 142 in Sy.No.287/18, 288/12, 288/13 Gangavaram Revenue Mandal, Chittoor District to pending disposal of the Writ Petition. 138, 139 at Gandrajupalli Village, an extent of 0.74 acres Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K-RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
VEER 2 to 4: M/S. SANTHI CHANDRA (SC FOR APIIC) GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE Counsel for the Respondent No.1: The Court made the following order;
APHC010046242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SriiH MM [3331] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2322/2025 Between: 1.M/S. RAMACHANDRA ROOFING SHEETS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY,, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPX. SMT. M.MANISHA REDDY, D.NO.4-314, BC COLONY, BAIREDDYPALLI VILLAGE, CHITTOOR-517 415. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICt, ANDHRA PRADESH. INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE 2.THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER AM, A.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED, MANGALAGIRI, ANDHRA PRADESH. HEAD OFFICE 3.THE ZONAL MANAGER, A.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ZONAL OFFICE, D.NO.22-1124, SBI CORPORATION LIMITED COLONY, 2ND MAIN, K.R.PALLI, PUTTUR ROAD, CHITTOOR. 4.THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P. INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATION LIMITED MANGALAGIRI.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
pleased to issue an Order or direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring Gandrajupalli/Chittoor/2021 dated 08.01.2025 wherein the 3rd Respondent rejecting for extension of time for implementation of the project without supplying the copy of the minutes of EOT Committee dated 17.12.2024 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the 3rd Respondent to extend thp time till 16.07.2025 for implementation of the project lA NO:
1 OF 2025 the proceeding Lr.No.42050/APIiC/M SME in Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representation dated 08.01.2025 of the Petitioner for extension of time for implementation of the project till then not to take any coercive steps for dispossessing the Petitioner from the land allotted by the Respondents in Plot No.129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142 in Sy.No.287/18, 288/12, 288/13 at Gandrajupalli Village, Gangavaram Revenue Mandal, Chittoor District to an extent of 0.74 acres, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KRAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SANTHI CHANDRA SC ForAPIIC 2.GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following:
:: ORDER:: In pursuance of the Memo filed vide U.S.R.No.65219 of 2025, dated 02.07.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri K Raghu Veer, Advocate [OPUC]
2.
One CC to M/s. Santhi Chandra (SC For APIIC) Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP for Industries & Pradesh [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies Commerce, High Court of Andhra TF
HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 2322 OF 2025 ss ^ 1 9 JUL 2025 CO SsCuffent Sectiopx^i^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS