Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54639 (CHH)

BRIJESH SHARMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2230/2025 · 2025-05-04

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:20451 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2230 of 2025 1 - Brijesh Sharma S/o Shri Om Prakash Sharma Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 36 New Khursipar Market, Khursipar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - District Collector District Durg, Collectorate, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tehsildar, Durg, Tehsil Office, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Patwari Halka Number 53, Junwani Road, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Durg, Chhattisgarh. 6 - Ravinder Singh Madan S/o Madan Singh Madaan R/o House No. 70, Nehru Nagar (Old), Motilal Nehru Nagar, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Smt. Krishna Agrawal D/o Dhanpat Agrawal Aged About 45 Years R/o 33 C, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 8 - Anil Agrawal S/o Dhanpat Agrawal Aged About 43 Years R/o 33 C, Light Industrial Area, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.12 19:50:44 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1, 2, 4 & 5 : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 05/05/2025 1. Heard Mr. Bhaskar Payashi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Santosh Bharat, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondents No.1, 2, 4 & 5 as well as Mr. Rajesh Kumar Kesharwani, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances raised by the petitioner has already been resolved, as such, the petition has become infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi