Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54634 (CHH)

AGRAHIJ NIRMALKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4026/2019 · 2025-10-15

Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:51549 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4026 of 2019 1 - Agrahij Nirmalkar S/o Late Rikhiram Nirmalkar Aged About 55 Years R/o Diprapara (Potiya Road), Ward No. 9 Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vyas Kumar Umre S/o Late Shiv Kumar Umre Aged About 58 Years Umre Bada, Kasaridih Durg, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. 3 - Dilip Kumar Verma S/o Late J. R. Verma Aged About 61 Years R/o 83/3 Nehru Nagar (East) Near Bakshi Garden, Bhilai Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Directorate Urban Administration And Development Through Its Director, Indrawati Bhawan, Captial Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Takhat Ram S/o Sarwan Kumar Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Manohar Lal S/o Motilal Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Harij Kumar S/o Tatoba Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2025.10.16 15:15:08 +0530 2 District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 7 - Rajesh Kumar S/o Haridas Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 8 - Bhagwat Ram Sahu S/o Kartik Ram Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 9 - Nand Kumar Sinha S/o Radheshyam Sinha Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 10 - Polush Masih S/o Late Prem Masih Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 11 - D. Prasad Rao S/o D. Gabriel Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 12 - Ramesh Kumar Kori S/o Budhlal Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 13 - Govind Prasad Soni S/o Raviram Working As Pump Attendant, Municipal Corporation- Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate. For Res No.1 & 2/State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Govt. Advocate. For Res No.3 : Mr. Sandeep Dubey, Advocate. For Res No.4 to 13 : None. SB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order on Board 16.10.2025 1. This Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions to decide the petitioner's representation. 3 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions holding that the petitioners are entitled for pay scale fo Pump attainment since year 2008 as they are senior to the private respondents and are entitled for all consequential service benefit in the said post. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions quashing the appointment of the private respondents in the post of Pump attainment. 10.4 Any other relief as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit looking to the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded." 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed of reserving the liberty in favour of the petitioners to file fresh representation before the competent Authority raising all their grievances, as juniors are getting more salary then the petitioner, and the Authority may be directed to decide the representation in an expeditious manner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents would not oppose the aforesaid limited prayer. 4. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties and considering the limited relief sought by the petitioners, it is directed that if the petitioners file fresh representation before the competent Authority within a period of 30 days from this order, the competent Authority shall decide same with a speaking order, expeditiously, preferably within outer limit of 6 months. 5. With the aforesaid direction this petition stands disposed of. 4 6. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and the concerned Authority shall decide the case/representation of the petitioners on its own merits in accordance with the relevant rules/law. Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Ajay