1 2025:CGHC:52001 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5492 of 2025 1 - Hirauram Jatwar S/o Shri Bhuruwa Ram Jatwar Aged About 58 Years R/o Ward No. 02, Sadakpara Cell, Balodabazar, Tahsil Kasdol, District- Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) ...Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretay, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Mantralaya Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - District Treasury Officer Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 6 - Station House Officer Police Station Gole Bazar Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh …Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Chandrasen Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Soumitra Kesharwani, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 17.10.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:- 10.1 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities consider the representation and to grant compensation amount of Rs. 2,00,000/- as per notification dated 25.02.2022, with interest from date of incident, within stipulated time, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted, in the interest of justice. 2 2. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Hon'ble Court to the Respondents, to decide the representation (Annexure P-1) dated 10.03.2024 within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 3. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer. His pending representation will be considered in accordance with law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the concerned respondent No. 4 to consider/decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P/1) in accordance with law/rules/regulations and in an objective manner as expeditiously as possible within a period of 120 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti