2025:KER:25936 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RFA NO. 93 OF 2018 (J) AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 26.08.2017 IN O.S. NO.77 OF 2014 OF SUB COURT, MAVELIKKARA APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: LAKSHMI @ LAKSHMI RAJESH W/O.RAJESH KUMAR, VISWAKARMA, VEMPATIL VEDU, KRISHNAPURAM MURI, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY THALUK, ALAPPUZHA. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: SATHEESH KUMAR AGED 41 YEARS S/O.SOMASUNDRAN PILLAI, PARETHU VEEDU, PAYAR VADAKKUM MURI, PUTHUPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY THALUK, ALAPPUZHA-688033 BY ADVS. SRI.M.R.HARIRAJ SRI.K.RAJAGOPAL SHRI. JAYRAJ M.B. SHRI.VISWAJITH C.K THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:25936 R.F.A. No. 93 of 2018 2 JUDGMENT Dated this the 26th day of March, 2025 This regular first appeal has been filed under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the decree and judgment in O.S. No.77 of 2014 dated 26.08.2017 on the files of the Sub Court, Mavelikara. The appellant herein is the defendant and the respondent is the plaintiff in the above suit. 2. Today, when the matter has been taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the decree of the trial court already executed and the appeal is not intended to be proceeded. The otherside also concedes the execution of the decree. 3. Recording the submission made by both sides, the regular first appeal stands dismissed. All interlocutory orders stand vacated and all interlocutory applications pending in this regular first appeal also stand dismissed. Sd/- A. BADHARUDEEN SK JUDGE