( 2025:HHC:4183 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Revision No. 8 of 2020 Date of decision: 3rd March, 2025 Sanchit Garg …Petitioner. Versus Dinesh Chand & others …Respondents. Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner. Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate vice Mr.Vivek Singh Negi, Advocate. For the Respondent: Respondent No.1(a) already ex-parte vide order dated 22.11.2021. Respondents No.2 and 3 have expired. Mr. Ankit Chandel, Advocate vice Mr.Anshul Attri, Advocate for respondent No.4. None for respondents No.5 to 8 though represented by Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) Steps for service of respondents No.1(b) as well as consequential steps on account of death of respondents No.2 and 3 have not been taken since long, despite grating numerous opportunities. 2 Learned counsel for petitioner submits that despite making all out efforts, petitioner is not coming forward to impart instructions so as to enable the counsel to take appropriate steps. ( 2025:HHC:4183 ) 3 In view of aforesaid submissions, it appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter and accordingly, present Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Vivek Singh Thakur), 3rd March, 2025 Judge. (MS) 2