Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54629 (CHH)

RIYA RAI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1315/2022 · 2025-05-05

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:20788 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1315 of 2022 1 - Riya Rai W/o Shri Suman Rai Aged About 26 Years, House Wife 2 - Sunit Rai S/o Late Jogeshwar Rai Aged About 59 Years Lecture, Higher Secondary School, P.V. 18, Mayapur Pakhanjur, 3 - Rina Rai W/o Shri Sunit Rai Aged About 49 Years 4 - Suman Rai S/o Shri Sunit Rai Aged About 30 Years All R/o H.N. 57 Ward No. 1, P.V. 46 Pakhanjur, P.S. Pakhanjur, District - North Baster Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. - Bande, District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) 2 - Avani Mandal S/o Late Nagen Mandal Aged About 52 Years R/o P.V. 89 Vivek Nagar P.S. Bande, District - North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate For State /Respondent No.1 : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned GA For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per, Ramesh Sinha, C.J. 06/05/2025 ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.05.08 14:55:03 +0530 2 / 2 1. Heard Mr. Bhupendra Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioners. Also heard Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate for the State/ Respondent No.1 and Mr. Raja Sharma, learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the application by quashing the impugned F.I.R. no.36/2022 dated 30.07.2022 of the Police Station Bande, District –North Bastar Kanker, in the interest of justice.” 3. At the very outset learned State counsel would submit that the charge-sheet in this case has already been filed. 4. In view of the submission made by learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to challenge the charge-sheet before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the the petitioners to take recourse of law with respect to the charge-sheet. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice ashu