SMT. BIMLA BAI ( LEGAL HEIR ) v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
WPS/13286/2025 · 2025-11-24
Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54612 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54612 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:57168
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 13286 of 2025
1. Smt. Bimla Bai ( Legal Heir ) W/o Late Doman Singh Aged About 62 Years A Widow Of The Work Charged Employee, R/o H.No. 96 Pisegaon, Durg, Post Durg, Tehsil Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
2. Smt. Satroopa Bai (Legal Heir) W/o Late Dhanush Lal Sahu Aged About 53 Years A Widow Of The Work Charged Employee, R/o Village Jewra, Post Sirsa, Tehsil Sirsa, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner(s) versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
5. The Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division No. 01, Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate For State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.11.26 11:45:04 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 25.11.2025
1. The issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022].
2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be
disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish