APHC010562012017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 655/2017 Between: 1. C ANITHA, CHITTOOR DIST & 3 OTHERS, W/O. JOHNSON ST. JOSEPH WASHINGTON, AGED ABOUT:31 YEARS, 2. DUKE JOHNSON WASHINGTON(ANURAG), S/O. JOHNSON ST. JOSEPH WASHINGTON, AGED ABOUT: 4 YEARS, 3. HANSIKA JOHNSON WASHINGTON, D/O. JOHNSON ST. JOSEPH WASHINGTON, AGED ABOUT: 2 YEARS, 4. K. TULASI @ K. TULASI SWAROOP, W/O.C. SWAROOP KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, THE PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE MINORS, REP.BY THEIR MOTHER LEGAL GUARDIAN 1ST PETIT'ONER. ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE INDIAN-CHRISTIANS, PERMANENT R/O, D. NO. 17/390-2-B. 4, N.V.R. STREET, MADENAPALLE TOWN, CHITTOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. JOHNSON ST JOSEPH WASHINGTON KARNATAKA STATE, S/o. George Washington, Aged about: 47 years, R/o. Amba Nivas, NehruNagar, Manipal, Udupi District, Karnataka State, Pin No. 576104. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside the decree and judgement dt. 7.1.2016 in GWOP.No. 174 of 2010 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Madanapalle in the interest of justice and passx 2 Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam) On 12.03.2024, this Court passed the following order:- “None appears for the appellants. Post after four (04) weeks.” 2. On 16.04.2024, this Court passed the following order:- “None appears for the appellants. Post after Summer Vacation-2024.” 3. The petition was filed by petitioner No.1 Mother seeking appointment as guardian of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 minor children as well as other reliefs under Sections 7, 8, 15 and 17 of the Guardians and Wards Act., which was dismissed by the learned II Addl. District Judge, Madanapalle. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by petitioner No.1 Mother. 4. Today also, there is no representation on either side. 5. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J GVK 3 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.655 of 2017 Dt. 23.12.2025 GVK